An eight-year-old boy in France was detained and questioned by police for half an hour Wednesday after he allegedly made comments in school in praise of terrorists, police said. The child’s teacher said the child expressed “solidarity” with the gunmen. The principal of the school decided to report to police what had happened. The boy’s lawyer wrote that the child admitted to police saying the words: “I am with the terrorists.” However, when police asked him what the word “terrorism” meant, he replied: “I don’t know”. Sources |
OkiuraJan 29, 2015 8:16 AM
| lol |
 |
However, when police asked him what the word “terrorism” meant, he replied: “I don’t know”. [/quote] Exactly what I would say if I were a terrorist. |
 |
| Another future terrorist caught |
 |
| A troll in the making. |
LoneWolf said: @Josh makes me sad to call myself Canadian. |
| A traitor in the making, better get them while they are young and can be saved. |
 |
Hoppy said: A traitor in the making, better get them while they are young and can be saved. no they got trolled BIG TIME |
 All credit goes to Sacred. |
Spooks_McBones said: Another future terrorist caught celebration time |
| He was a sleeping cell, better take him to nearby propaganda office. We could use a double agent. |
| The most important things in life is the people that you care about |
| Where's freedom of speech now? What defines 'right' and 'wrong' for you now? The child merely supported the terrorists with words just like Charlie Hebdo merely offended Muslims through words, where is freedom of speech now? |
[i]"Yet each man kills the thing he loves, [/i]By each let this be heard, Some do it with a bitter look, Some with a flattering word, The coward does it with a kiss, The brave man with a sword!'' ~Oscar |
| He is believed to be the mastermind of the 2008 Mumbai attacks too. (he was then a sperm trying to reach his mother's Fallopian tubes in a city hotel). |
Abul-Blasphemy said: Where's freedom of speech now? I know right, where is the freedom of speech to go around been racist? we should all be free to spread whatever racism we want same with terrorism. I totally support terrorism and will spread its word just like I think people should have the right to say the N word in public to black people.  |
|
| take him to the electric chair gentlemen |
an egomaniac and a fool |
Spooks_McBones said: Abul-Blasphemy said: Where's freedom of speech now? I know right, where is the freedom of speech to go around been racist? we should all be free to spread whatever racism we want same with terrorism. I totally support terrorism and will spread its word just like I think people should have the right to say the N word in public to black people. That exactly is the type of freedom of speech people have been preaching after the Charlie Hebdo attack. I want the word "Nigger" to be legal for everyone to use! |
[i]"Yet each man kills the thing he loves, [/i]By each let this be heard, Some do it with a bitter look, Some with a flattering word, The coward does it with a kiss, The brave man with a sword!'' ~Oscar |
Emnay said: take him to the electric chair gentlemen No. More information on his terrorist compatriots must be gathered first! |
| "Let Justice Be Done!" My Theme Fight again, fight again for justice! |
Abul-Blasphemy said: Where's freedom of speech now? What defines 'right' and 'wrong' for you now? The child merely supported the terrorists with words just like Charlie Hebdo merely offended Muslims through words, where is freedom of speech now? I agree that what the magazine did was wrong but there is a difference between offending someone and killing them. If instead of a terrorist attack people held peaceful protests against Charlie Hebdo I don't think this whole freedom of speech thing would have happened however there was a terrorist attack and people got killed for publishing the cartoon and so this became associated with freedom of speech. The entire reason these protests are being held in my opinion is because the people are concerned that if they say something like this they will be killed by terrorists. This boy on the other hand is supporting the act of terrorism instead of saying that he did not approve of what was published in the magazine instead he is supporting the act of killing other people and that is the difference. |
| Cops are so funny |
 |
| The kid deserves it for being a fucking idiot. |
| Teacher probably told him to write it so they could feel like a big hero instead of a teacher. |
| Signature removed. Please follow the signature rules, as defined in the Site & Forum Guidelines. |
| this is what happens when you don't have freedom of speech 'MURICA! *sings US national anthem, but is terribly off pitch* |
| ^haha |
LoneWolf said: @Josh makes me sad to call myself Canadian. |
omeg4 said: Abul-Blasphemy said: Where's freedom of speech now? What defines 'right' and 'wrong' for you now? The child merely supported the terrorists with words just like Charlie Hebdo merely offended Muslims through words, where is freedom of speech now? I agree that what the magazine did was wrong but there is a difference between offending someone and killing them. If instead of a terrorist attack people held peaceful protests against Charlie Hebdo I don't think this whole freedom of speech thing would have happened however there was a terrorist attack and people got killed for publishing the cartoon and so this became associated with freedom of speech. The entire reason these protests are being held in my opinion is because the people are concerned that if they say something like this they will be killed by terrorists. This boy on the other hand is supporting the act of terrorism instead of saying that he did not approve of what was published in the magazine instead he is supporting the act of killing other people and that is the difference. I was just pointing out to the fact how hypocritical Freedom of Speech can really be. |
[i]"Yet each man kills the thing he loves, [/i]By each let this be heard, Some do it with a bitter look, Some with a flattering word, The coward does it with a kiss, The brave man with a sword!'' ~Oscar |
| You say that but it's exactly because of people like you that it is hypocritical. |
Play League of Legends here! Autocrat said: Hitler was good, objectively. |
Immahnoob said: You say that but it's exactly because of people like you that it is hypocritical. Explain this bullshit. |
[i]"Yet each man kills the thing he loves, [/i]By each let this be heard, Some do it with a bitter look, Some with a flattering word, The coward does it with a kiss, The brave man with a sword!'' ~Oscar |
 "GI Joe should win, alright ?" |
Abul-Blasphemy said: "Oh, they offended muh religion, pls ban et." Immahnoob said: You say that but it's exactly because of people like you that it is hypocritical. Explain this bullshit. Is what we're having right now and you're only making it go further. |
Play League of Legends here! Autocrat said: Hitler was good, objectively. |
Immahnoob said: Abul-Blasphemy said: "Oh, they offended muh religion, pls ban et." Explain this bullshit. Is what we're having right now and you're only making it go further. I never said that. But ok, tell me, why did they kick out that guy who was blamed to be "Anti-Semitic"? shouldn't offending Jews fall under Freedom of Speech too? Bruh, stop trying so hard. Freedom of Speech is full of holes. You can't fill them all with your penis at the same time. |
[i]"Yet each man kills the thing he loves, [/i]By each let this be heard, Some do it with a bitter look, Some with a flattering word, The coward does it with a kiss, The brave man with a sword!'' ~Oscar |
| Are you retarded? Where the hell am I supporting the current broken freedom of speech? I always supported how it should be, not how it is. And you did claim in the thread about Charlie that what he did was not "freedom of speech/expression", mostly because he offended your little Islam. |
Play League of Legends here! Autocrat said: Hitler was good, objectively. |
Abul-Blasphemy said: omeg4 said: I agree that what the magazine did was wrong but there is a difference between offending someone and killing them. If instead of a terrorist attack people held peaceful protests against Charlie Hebdo I don't think this whole freedom of speech thing would have happened however there was a terrorist attack and people got killed for publishing the cartoon and so this became associated with freedom of speech. The entire reason these protests are being held in my opinion is because the people are concerned that if they say something like this they will be killed by terrorists. This boy on the other hand is supporting the act of terrorism instead of saying that he did not approve of what was published in the magazine instead he is supporting the act of killing other people and that is the difference. I was just pointing out to the fact how hypocritical Freedom of Speech can really be. True freedom of speech is about expressing your opinion but by doing so if someone shows that they might become a terrorist in the future it is common sense to stop them before they have the chance to hurt or kill anyone. |
| An 8 year old becoming a terrorist in a first world country. That's some nice thinking omeg4. |
Play League of Legends here! Autocrat said: Hitler was good, objectively. |
cabacc2 said: ElPysCongroo said: do you claim that he was conscious about what he said, being proactive? Idiocy still requires proactivity, and from what I know he yields none of that. When it comes to forming even slightly complicated political opinions, children of that age don't act on their own, they just react. The kid deserves it for being a fucking idiot. You wouldn't call a calculator stupid or smart, would you? They just react to the input that you give, you determine the result based on what you choose to feed it with. I agree. He is just a kid. The ones who raised him are to be blamed. The people who are affected the most because of extremists are other ordinary muslims. because of incidents like this there is going to be so much more discrimination against muslims its ironic how the extremists think they are fighting for islam but actually make life worse for everybody who practices it |
Immahnoob said: An 8 year old becoming a terrorist in a first world country. That's some nice thinking omeg4. Not talking about the 8 year old. I'm just talking in general about people who support terrorism |
Immahnoob said: Are you retarded? Where the hell am I supporting the current broken freedom of speech? I always supported how it should be, not how it is. And you did claim in the thread about Charlie that what he did was not "freedom of speech/expression", mostly because he offended your little Islam. WOAAAHHH!!! how it should be then? color me surprised this is the first time I've seen you going back on your words. My stand is still clear. Hate speech does not equate Freedom of Speech but if the World dictates to me that Freedom of Speech does allow you Hate speech, then so be it. I'll just point out the flaws here and there. |
[i]"Yet each man kills the thing he loves, [/i]By each let this be heard, Some do it with a bitter look, Some with a flattering word, The coward does it with a kiss, The brave man with a sword!'' ~Oscar |
WOAAAHHH!!! how it should be then? color me surprised this is the first time I've seen you going back on your words. I never went back on my words, and I already told you how it should be, freedom of speech should be able to offend.My stand is still clear. Hate speech does not equate Freedom of Speech but if the World dictates to me that Freedom of Speech does allow you Hate speech, then so be it. I'll just point out the flaws here and there. Hate speech is freedom of speech, and arguing against hate speech is freedom of speech, you're not pointing out flaws, you're pointing out your inability to:1. Read. 2. Argue. 3. Being rational. |
Play League of Legends here! Autocrat said: Hitler was good, objectively. |
Immahnoob said: WOAAAHHH!!! how it should be then? color me surprised this is the first time I've seen you going back on your words. I never went back on my words, and I already told you how it should be, freedom of speech should be able to offend.My stand is still clear. Hate speech does not equate Freedom of Speech but if the World dictates to me that Freedom of Speech does allow you Hate speech, then so be it. I'll just point out the flaws here and there. Hate speech is freedom of speech, and arguing against hate speech is freedom of speech, you're not pointing out flaws, you're pointing out your inability to:1. Read. 2. Argue. 3. Being rational. ok, then explain to me why this boy was detained? |
[i]"Yet each man kills the thing he loves, [/i]By each let this be heard, Some do it with a bitter look, Some with a flattering word, The coward does it with a kiss, The brave man with a sword!'' ~Oscar |
Abul-Blasphemy said: 1. Inability to read.Immahnoob said: I never went back on my words, and I already told you how it should be, freedom of speech should be able to offend. Hate speech is freedom of speech, and arguing against hate speech is freedom of speech, you're not pointing out flaws, you're pointing out your inability to: 1. Read. 2. Argue. 3. Being rational. ok, then explain to me why this boy was detained? Should I add a 4? 4. Unable to be relevant. |
Play League of Legends here! Autocrat said: Hitler was good, objectively. |
| try harder. You're losing your edge. |
[i]"Yet each man kills the thing he loves, [/i]By each let this be heard, Some do it with a bitter look, Some with a flattering word, The coward does it with a kiss, The brave man with a sword!'' ~Oscar |
Abul-Blasphemy said: Try harder. You never had edge in the first place, especially when you were and are talking to me.try harder. You're losing your edge. |
Play League of Legends here! Autocrat said: Hitler was good, objectively. |
| You are just gonna fall even more now. Your abilities are rusting. Go take a break. It should heal you. |
[i]"Yet each man kills the thing he loves, [/i]By each let this be heard, Some do it with a bitter look, Some with a flattering word, The coward does it with a kiss, The brave man with a sword!'' ~Oscar |
Abul-Blasphemy said: "I have no argument and I'm falling back on my words, now I will flatter copy Immahnoob." - geniobastardoYou are just gonna fall even more now. Your abilities are rusting. Go take a break. It should heal you. Why aren't you properly arguing with me? I think it's because:  |
Play League of Legends here! Autocrat said: Hitler was good, objectively. |
| now that's more like it. |
[i]"Yet each man kills the thing he loves, [/i]By each let this be heard, Some do it with a bitter look, Some with a flattering word, The coward does it with a kiss, The brave man with a sword!'' ~Oscar |
Abul-Blasphemy said: This isn't helping you cause.now that's more like it. |
Play League of Legends here! Autocrat said: Hitler was good, objectively. |
| That's because you've already lost this debate. |
[i]"Yet each man kills the thing he loves, [/i]By each let this be heard, Some do it with a bitter look, Some with a flattering word, The coward does it with a kiss, The brave man with a sword!'' ~Oscar |
| I doubt the child knows what he's talking about, either someone tricked him into saying it as a prank of sorts which I think is unlikely or he is in contact with someone who is telling him this kind of stuff. If they interoggated the father instead, probably would've got more info. |
| I've been here way too long... |
Abul-Blasphemy said: Implying your words are of any relevancy. That's because you've already lost this debate. Trying to act like an idiot when you know you can't win an argument is pathetic, genio. And you also can't win at this contest either. Battles of attrition are easy to win. |
Play League of Legends here! Autocrat said: Hitler was good, objectively. |
More topics from this board
Sticky: » The Current Events Board Will Be Closed on Friday JST ( 1 2 3 4 5 ... Last Page )Luna - Aug 2, 2021 |
272 |
by traed
»»
Aug 5, 2021 5:56 PM |
|
» Third shot of Sinovac COVID-19 vaccine offers big increase in antibody levels: study ( 1 2 )Desolated - Jul 30, 2021 |
50 |
by Desolated
»»
Aug 5, 2021 3:24 PM |
|
» Western vaccine producers engage in shameless profiteering while poorer countries are supplied mainly by China.Desolated - Aug 5, 2021 |
1 |
by Bourmegar
»»
Aug 5, 2021 3:23 PM |
|
» NLRB officer says Amazon violated US labor lawDesolated - Aug 3, 2021 |
17 |
by kitsune0
»»
Aug 5, 2021 1:41 PM |
|
» China Backs Cuba in Saying US Should Apply Sanctions To ItselfDesolated - Aug 5, 2021 |
10 |
by Desolated
»»
Aug 5, 2021 1:36 PM |