|
Offline Joined: Mar 2005 Posts: 3808 |
kashim said: Mawootad said: Manga_sama said: Basic economics: a product/serivce without substitutes has higher demand and lower demand-elasticity than a product/service with substitutes. In other words, loli decreases the amount of child molestation.I've never viewed anime characters as actual people. They will always be cartoon characters to me. The danger lies in each person's imagination and brain, rather than the content. If I watched the stuff, it wouldn't make me a dangerous person. If a pedophile watched it, maybe. And,as recent statistics show, decreases number of births in Japan. Plus, it increases number of upskirt photographers and 'pillow-huggers'. At least that's what I believe. I'm talking here mostly about lolicon and some fandoms,. Haruhi and alike. 4/10, weak troll anyway, as I've always maintained, anime sometimes has too much of good things. Fanservice, lolis, explosions, giant robots, dancing characters, memes, self-references, they all fall under that category of stuff that ppl get tired of once certain anime abuse their existances. So even tho I did create this...I say quality over quantity gais ![]() |
|
Offline Joined: Jan 2008 Posts: 1275 |
kei-clone said: kashim said: Mawootad said: Manga_sama said: Basic economics: a product/serivce without substitutes has higher demand and lower demand-elasticity than a product/service with substitutes. In other words, loli decreases the amount of child molestation.I've never viewed anime characters as actual people. They will always be cartoon characters to me. The danger lies in each person's imagination and brain, rather than the content. If I watched the stuff, it wouldn't make me a dangerous person. If a pedophile watched it, maybe. And,as recent statistics show, decreases number of births in Japan. Plus, it increases number of upskirt photographers and 'pillow-huggers'. At least that's what I believe. I'm talking here mostly about lolicon and some fandoms,. Haruhi and alike. 4/10, weak troll anyway, as I've always maintained, anime sometimes has too much of good things. Fanservice, lolis, explosions, giant robots, dancing characters, memes, self-references, they all fall under that category of stuff that ppl get tired of once certain anime abuse their existances. So even tho I did create this...I say quality over quantity gais Not a troll but my personal opinion. You don't have to agree with it ;] Overall, I'm sort of disappointed with the flood of fanservice oriented anime with lack of any serious plot whatsoever. There is too few adult titles nowadays (anime), e.g. Ergo Proxy, Texhnolyze, Kaiba, Aoi Bungaku, etc. And no, I don't take hentai into consideration ^^ ![]() "There is a road in the hearts of all of us, hidden and seldom traveled, which leads to an unknown, secret place." |
|
Offline Joined: Oct 2009 Posts: 505 |
Loli is more cute then sexy to me anyway. "It's ok to like Loli and masterbate to it as long if you don't touch real kids." xD ![]() |
|
Offline Joined: Aug 2009 Posts: 177 |
sadly in anime plot is ill-relevant when tits and twats are concerned as it is complete fanservice for the most part regardless the perceived age of the character is in question.. as they say sex sells.. unfortunately, sometimes taste can be irked when watching said anime, ecchi or hentai genre.. is you see sex dumdum you're not watching anime, you're likely watching ecchi or hentai.. ![]() |
|
Offline Joined: May 2008 Posts: 31913 |
kashim said: And,as recent statistics show, decreases number of births in Japan. The implications you've put behind this statement are simply massive. Most of which are Unfortunate implications. That's why it sounds like a troll, if it's not. The part about pillow huggers and Haruhi sounds even more bullish and coincidental enough to sound like a troll. Anyway, even with the birthrate worries in Japan, Japan is still a pretty crowded place. And the world is still not only overpopulated, but alarming still growing fast. I don't see how an appeal to nature would fit a Utilitarianism perspective right now. Furthermore, the root causes and even barely related causes of Japan's birth rate are endlessly hypothesized about by anthropologists and sociologists. I don't lolicon has ever been a major consideration when discussing Japan's birthrate. And if lolicons really are pedophiles as some state, they probably shouldn't have baby-making as a goal. Your statement essentially looks silly, offensive, or purposely so, which would make it a troll. It's probably even worse if your statement isn't a troll than if it is. Tachii said: anime was always mostly targeted for adolescences to begin with. Interestingly though, if the "cartoons are for kids" in Japan just like they are in the U.S., that also says some interesting things about child sexuality and the implications therein, on a lot of stuff. People are always going on saying that anime is for an older audience for the content, whereas people retort that anime is still viewed as a kid's thing in Japan, and that these are kids shows. There may be an elitism on the "anime is for adults" side and anti-elitism and pro-American toon mentality in "anime is still for kids in Japan" to each side, but one is right or the other. Apparently, a lot of the shows rated for adults, censored in most available versions, and more rare uncensored versions released, are actually for kids in reality. Which means, sexuality is being targeted towards underage kids in Japan. And without any noticeable disturbing effect. The kids are crying to their parents that they barely naked and sexual acts were on their cartoon show. So a lot of these "lolicons" pushing these boundaries and setting trends, are probably largely underage kids themselves. When thinking of "protecting the kids" here, it may be just as useful to think of all the sexual material children are watching and all the sexual material being marketed toward children. When seeing all this material of younger boys having sexual encounters with older women, could it be telling young boys that not only is it okay for older women to have relations with them, but that they should go for older women. Interestingly, I think a lot of the discussion in this topic has possibly been made under the assumption that anime is an adult leaning genre of entertainment. Nitre said: K-on To me, K-on isn't a very loli show. And it's a proof that maybe we're moving a bit out of the loli trend and a bit into a moe trend. ![]() ![]() Old avatar and sig retired for now. |
|
Offline Joined: Jan 2008 Posts: 1275 |
Ok, not to quote quotations of quotations @Smasher Concerning statistics, there was an article about it which I read some weeks age. Can't pinpoint it right now. @Tachii There was some anime works for adults in the past, e.g. by Go Nagai and even titles You mention, e.g. Gundam had strong adult vibes (Zeta by killem all Tomino). @ukonkivi Ok, this was my implication and belief and not a fact which I mentioned earlier. And defeinitely I didn't imply about loli anime creating/influencing paedophiles although the rising number of preeten hentai games/mangas is quite disturbing. To summarize, it can influence birth race but the degree of such depends on people themselves. This problem, among others in Japan, was shown in Welcome to NHK. All in all, I didn't mean to offend anyone so don't get worked up :F ![]() "There is a road in the hearts of all of us, hidden and seldom traveled, which leads to an unknown, secret place." |
|
IRC Moderator
Online Joined: Jun 2008 Posts: 10309 |
kashim said: I didn't say there weren't any adult works. Just that most works are targeted for adolescences. Works like Monster and Gankutsuou seem to share no similar vibe for younger youths, as well.@Tachii There was some anime works for adults in the past, e.g. by Go Nagai and even titles You mention, e.g. Gundam had strong adult vibes (Zeta by killem all Tomino). ![]() |
|
Offline Joined: Aug 2009 Posts: 178 |
I was under the impression that loli meant a very young girl. Why are Shana, Louise, Taiga and Yuki being brought up? They all, for the most part, just look like high schoolers with flat chests. The cast of Lucky Star, however, look like children. Correct me if I'm wrong. ![]() |
|
Offline Joined: Aug 2008 Posts: 16 |
I hope so. The more lolicon tropes were seeping into mainstream anime, the skeevier it was getting to be an anime fan by association. I tend to stay away from moe and datesim shows, but it was impossible to escape their influence over the last few years. If there is a backlash, it's long overdue. ![]() |
|
Offline Joined: Jan 2008 Posts: 473 |
ukonkivi said: GeneralZaroff said: Why are Shana, Louise, Taiga and Yuki being brought up? Because they are frequently mentioned as lolis. Loli is more of a rather vague movement and classification that formed alongside the moe movement and classification, to my understanding. One of it's meanings is youth, but it's apparently not limited to that. Rie Kugimiya is frequently regarded as a famous "loli voice actress" and her lolis of fame are cited as being Taiga, Louise, and Shana. On gelbooru, those three are frequently given the tag "loli". Also Yuki Nagato and Mikuru Asahina are a good example of though overlapping, moe and loli are both very different. And Kyon's Sister and Yuki Nagato are the most loli in all of the Haruhi cast, while Mikuru Asahina embodies the moe aesthetic more than anyone in Haruhi Suzumiya Melancholy. Yuki Nagato is notable for being the flattest older character in Haruhi, while Kyon's sister is just young. Too differently defined lolis, one being young and one just being flat and uncurvy, but I believe they share the same aesthetic movement. And Mikuru Asahina being curvy, big breasted, but also appeal very strongly to the moe aesthetic more than anyone else in the cast. So in my opinion, loli CAN mean young, but it's not limited to that definition. interesting way to think about that. i never would have classified Nagato under the loli category but i guess i wouldn't necessarily disqualify her from it...actually yeah i think i would. i think there are two ways of looking at at. one is strictly the age factor. personally i would say loli is anything 14 years and below, which would pretty much scrap out any of the high school girls that were mentioned before (shana, taiga etc etc). the other would be the something like the "look" of it. basically they have to look like they are around the 14 and below age range. example : Komoe Tsukuyomi is an adult and a teacher, but looks like she is 10 or something. Nagato barely makes it into what i would call the loli age range and she definitely doesn't have that loli look or style going for her (same with any of those previously mentioned characters). don't really know if that was a coherent argument but i just woke up so forgive me. ![]() |
|
Offline Joined: Aug 2008 Posts: 16 |
gnomeybum said: Just on the Lucky Star topic, I didn't really think that they were Loli... I mean, I thought loli was when they actually were little girls, but the girls from Lucky Star are just quite young looking. I mean, they aren't really sexualised at all... You fail to grasp the definition of this kink. The point of a loli is that she's not typically "sexualized." ![]() |
|
Offline Joined: Jan 2009 Posts: 3 |
Hmm... interesting topic you've got going on here. I personally can't stand this moe/loli trend that has been going on, im an adult and i dont care for seeing a child or what looks to me like a child dressed in bikini's or underwear being sexual, and when i see a series that within the first episode or two is based mostly around this i will avoid it like the black plague. Only time i will ever watch series such as these is if im told by someone that the story is extremely well thought out or it has some great plot twists, then i will try and bear with it. I also dont much care for the animes which are focused on overly large breasted women(example: whitch blade) i watch anime for the stories and art work, if i want to see giant boob's i'll go buy a playboy. But as someone else has already said before (dont remember exactly who) sex sells, and the anime franchize is a business and they are there to sell the shows and all the merchandise of the show (posters toys dvd's etc). really wish this wasn't the case, i feel that if we didn't have these things in 85% of todays anime being aired we would have alot more quality anime to watch instead of crap that was thrown togeather over night. I however dont see these trends going away as soon as i would like because there is always going to be a market for them, and when there's someone willing to buy something someone else is willing to make it. These are just my opinion's on the topic. ![]() |










